top of page

🚫 Valuation Myth #2: ā€œLast Price per Share = Fair Valueā€

  • Kevin Pearl
  • Dec 4, 2025
  • 1 min read

In Part 1 of our mini-series, we showed why cost ≠ fair value. Now let’s tackle another shortcut: using the last price per share (LPPS) from the most recent round as fair value.


Why LPPS Misleads

  • It’s just one round - not all the rounds.

  • It ignores preferences and protections baked into that round and other rounds

  • It treats all shares like common shares, which they’re not.

  • It ignores upside potential across the cap table.

  • At the end of the day, it’s simply the cost of the latest round - and cost is not fair value.


What Standards Say

Both IPEV and ASC 820 are clear: last round price can be a useful input, but it must be calibrated for:


  • Company performance since the round

  • Market conditions and comparables

  • Rights and preferences across share classes


The Risks of Relying on LPPS

  • Misleading reporting šŸ“Š

  • Compliance gaps āš–ļø

  • Trust erosion šŸ¤

  • Exit surprises šŸ’ø


šŸ‘‰ Last price per share reflects one deal, in the past. šŸ‘‰ Fair value reflects what your holdings are worth today.


That’s why global standards push us toward fair value, it’s the clearest picture of where things stand now.


Comments


bottom of page